29th Jan 2011 at 11:26 pm
I aim to misbehave
30th Jan 2011 at 10:46 am
What Barry saidSame.
30th Jan 2011 at 11:24 am
30th Jan 2011 at 1:31 pm
I aim to misbehave
Having looked it up, that is totally crazy and I really hope it resolves itself with a minimum amount of bloodshed, from the looks of it there has already been too much.
30th Jan 2011 at 1:37 pm
Quote: Charles D*ckens, Jan 2011Having looked it up, that is totally crazy and I really hope it resolves itself with a minimum amount of bloodshed, from the looks of it there has already been too much.
Care to share? Cos sharing is caring.
30th Jan 2011 at 1:40 pm
30th Jan 2011 at 1:42 pm
Quote: Abin Cooper, Jan 2011Nothing like a good old fashioned uprising..Quote: Charles D*ckens, Jan 2011Having looked it up, that is totally crazy and I really hope it resolves itself with a minimum amount of bloodshed, from the looks of it there has already been too much.
Care to share? Cos sharing is caring.
Tunisia rose up and overthrew their government cause of rising food costs and unemployment and all that fun stuff. Egypt saw that and was like 'hey we have rising food costs and unemployment as well!' and now they have like...taken the capital pretty much. Apparently there's no police and what soldiers there are are pretty much just getting along like friends with the protesters. America has apparently told the Egyptian government that they aren't allowed to just shoot all the protesters, which is nice of them, maybe America is going to offer to do it for them, who knows.
basically it seems like the protesters won't be happy until...President Mubarak steps down and President Mubarak won't be happy until the protesters get bored and go home.
That is what I believe the situation to be based on my quick research, I imagine it's not entirely accurate.
30th Jan 2011 at 1:45 pm
Quote: Charles D*ckens, Jan 2011We are the Judean People's Front, NOT the People's Front of Judea!Quote: Abin Cooper, Jan 2011Nothing like a good old fashioned uprising..Quote: Charles D*ckens, Jan 2011Having looked it up, that is totally crazy and I really hope it resolves itself with a minimum amount of bloodshed, from the looks of it there has already been too much.
Care to share? Cos sharing is caring.
Tunisia rose up and overthrew their government cause of rising food costs and unemployment and all that fun stuff. Egypt saw that and was like 'hey we have rising food costs and unemployment as well!' and now they have like...taken the capital pretty much. Apparently there's no police and what soldiers there are are pretty much just getting along like friends with the protesters. America has apparently told the Egyptian government that they aren't allowed to just shoot all the protesters, which is nice of them, maybe America is going to offer to do it for them, who knows.
basically it seems like the protesters won't be happy until...President Mubarak steps down and President Mubarak won't be happy until the protesters get bored and go home.
That is what I believe the situation to be based on my quick research, I imagine it's not entirely accurate.
30th Jan 2011 at 2:20 pm
I aim to misbehave
Oh and apparently loads of prisoners all over Egypt have overthrown their guards and escaped, which is CRAZY.
30th Jan 2011 at 2:23 pm
Quote: Charles D*ckens, Jan 2011Oh and apparently loads of prisoners all over Egypt have overthrown their guards and escaped, which is CRAZY.
Wow, that's possibly the worst part of all
30th Jan 2011 at 2:36 pm
Quote: Abin Cooper, Jan 2011That I did not know.Quote: Charles D*ckens, Jan 2011Oh and apparently loads of prisoners all over Egypt have overthrown their guards and escaped, which is CRAZY.
Wow, that's possibly the worst part of all
Yeah it's pretty bad. It's also the part that pushes it from being a terrible current news event into sounding like the plot of a film. Desensitized? Me? No.
It is pretty horrible, over 100 deaths in the capital apparently.
30th Jan 2011 at 10:13 pm
30th Jan 2011 at 10:20 pm
How would you survive if the government killed the internet? I had no laptop today and got a sh*tload done.We were talking about this in work the other week. Conversation then devolved into just how easy it would be to use the internet, or rather massive denial of internet as a major terrorist attack.
30th Jan 2011 at 10:21 pm
Quote: James, Jan 2011How would you survive if the government killed the internet? I had no laptop today and got a sh*tload done.We were talking about this in work the other week. Conversation then devolved into just how easy it would be to use the internet, or ratehr massive denial of internet as a mjaor terrorist attack.
In all seriousness, it wouldn't take much effort to completely bring the world to a standstill.
A few staff in ISP's throughout the world. A remotely triggered bomb stored in a 1 or 2U rack mount server, thats destined for a major POP or nodal point. (Seriously, security checks at these places are none existant - at least in the UK, so it would be alarmingly easy to set this up.) You could even leave it so the server was fully functional if you so chose.
Set them all off at once and sit back to watch the forthcoming global meltdown.
Sure there are other 'dark' and essentially 'off grid' services in place for use by the governments and militaries but they would never be able to cope with the scale of traffic needed to keep the worlds economy afloat for long enough to conduct more than a few minutes business. Something of this scale is recoverable, but it would take days, possibly weeks to get things back in order - the events that would occur in that time would pretty much do the damage needed.
30th Jan 2011 at 10:22 pm
I aim to misbehave
Quote: Animal, Jan 2011Quote: James, Jan 2011How would you survive if the government killed the internet? I had no laptop today and got a sh*tload done.We were talking about this in work the other week. Conversation then devolved into just how easy it would be to use the internet, or ratehr massive denial of internet as a mjaor terrorist attack.
In all seriousness, it wouldn't take much effort to completely bring the world to a standstill.
A few staff in ISP's throughout the world. A remotely triggered bomb stored in a 1 or 2U rack mount server, thats destined for a major POP or nodal point. (Seriously, security checks at these places are none existant - at least in the UK, so it would be alarmingly easy to set this up.) You could even leave it so the server was fully functional if you so chose.
Set them all off at once and sit back to watch the forthcoming global meltdown.
Sure there are other 'dark' and essentially 'off grid' services in place for use by the governments and militaries but they would never be able to cope with the scale of traffic needed to keep the worlds economy afloat for long enough to conduct more than a few minutes business. Something of this scale is recoverable, but it would take days, possibly weeks to get things back in order - the events that would occur in that time would pretty much do the damage needed.
And then you'd just have to penetrate their protocols and you'd be in control of everything.
30th Jan 2011 at 10:25 pm
Quote: Animal, Jan 2011ROLFCOPTER.Quote: James, Jan 2011How would you survive if the government killed the internet? I had no laptop today and got a sh*tload done.We were talking about this in work the other week. Conversation then devolved into just how easy it would be to use the internet, or ratehr massive denial of internet as a mjaor terrorist attack.
In all seriousness, it wouldn't take much effort to completely bring the world to a standstill.
A few staff in ISP's throughout the world. A remotely triggered bomb stored in a 1 or 2U rack mount server, thats destined for a major POP or nodal point. (Seriously, security checks at these places are none existant - at least in the UK, so it would be alarmingly easy to set this up.) You could even leave it so the server was fully functional if you so chose.
Set them all off at once and sit back to watch the forthcoming global meltdown.
Sure there are other 'dark' and essentially 'off grid' services in place for use by the governments and militaries but they would never be able to cope with the scale of traffic needed to keep the worlds economy afloat for long enough to conduct more than a few minutes business. Something of this scale is recoverable, but it would take days, possibly weeks to get things back in order - the events that would occur in that time would pretty much do the damage needed.
And then you'd just have to penetrate their protocols and you'd be in control of everything.
30th Jan 2011 at 10:28 pm
Quote: Charles D*ckens, Jan 2011Quote: Animal, Jan 2011Quote: James, Jan 2011How would you survive if the government killed the internet? I had no laptop today and got a sh*tload done.We were talking about this in work the other week. Conversation then devolved into just how easy it would be to use the internet, or ratehr massive denial of internet as a mjaor terrorist attack.
In all seriousness, it wouldn't take much effort to completely bring the world to a standstill.
A few staff in ISP's throughout the world. A remotely triggered bomb stored in a 1 or 2U rack mount server, thats destined for a major POP or nodal point. (Seriously, security checks at these places are none existant - at least in the UK, so it would be alarmingly easy to set this up.) You could even leave it so the server was fully functional if you so chose.
Set them all off at once and sit back to watch the forthcoming global meltdown.
Sure there are other 'dark' and essentially 'off grid' services in place for use by the governments and militaries but they would never be able to cope with the scale of traffic needed to keep the worlds economy afloat for long enough to conduct more than a few minutes business. Something of this scale is recoverable, but it would take days, possibly weeks to get things back in order - the events that would occur in that time would pretty much do the damage needed.
And then you'd just have to penetrate their protocols and you'd be in control of everything.
But what about the firewall, George? WHAT ABOUT THE FIREWALL?!
30th Jan 2011 at 10:33 pm
I aim to misbehave
Quote: Abin Cooper, Jan 2011Quote: Charles D*ckens, Jan 2011Quote: Animal, Jan 2011Quote: James, Jan 2011How would you survive if the government killed the internet? I had no laptop today and got a sh*tload done.We were talking about this in work the other week. Conversation then devolved into just how easy it would be to use the internet, or ratehr massive denial of internet as a mjaor terrorist attack.
In all seriousness, it wouldn't take much effort to completely bring the world to a standstill.
A few staff in ISP's throughout the world. A remotely triggered bomb stored in a 1 or 2U rack mount server, thats destined for a major POP or nodal point. (Seriously, security checks at these places are none existant - at least in the UK, so it would be alarmingly easy to set this up.) You could even leave it so the server was fully functional if you so chose.
Set them all off at once and sit back to watch the forthcoming global meltdown.
Sure there are other 'dark' and essentially 'off grid' services in place for use by the governments and militaries but they would never be able to cope with the scale of traffic needed to keep the worlds economy afloat for long enough to conduct more than a few minutes business. Something of this scale is recoverable, but it would take days, possibly weeks to get things back in order - the events that would occur in that time would pretty much do the damage needed.
And then you'd just have to penetrate their protocols and you'd be in control of everything.
But what about the firewall, George? WHAT ABOUT THE FIREWALL?!
IT IS A WALL THAT IS ALREADY ON FIRE, I THINK IT WILL COLLAPSE WITHOUT ANY REAL EFFORT, MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH I AM TIMOTHY OLYPHANT
30th Jan 2011 at 10:40 pm
30th Jan 2011 at 11:16 pm
I aim to misbehave
31st Jan 2011 at 6:44 pm
Technically sexy.
31st Jan 2011 at 8:48 pm
1st Feb 2011 at 12:42 pm
Outside-left
1st Feb 2011 at 3:18 pm
And now the Army are refusing to supress the protests...does this mean they're going to assure a transition of power is peaceful, or are they tagging along with things with the aim of installing one of their own at the top?
1st Feb 2011 at 6:57 pm
Technically sexy.
Quote: Albert Johanneson, Feb 2011And now the Army are refusing to supress the protests...does this mean they're going to assure a transition of power is peaceful, or are they tagging along with things with the aim of installing one of their own at the top?
There doesn't seem to be much in the way of a party or person to fill the forthcoming power vacuum, but hopefully we'll avoid a Napoleon figure rising.
The United States wants Mubarek to go; he's going to go within the week, I think.
3rd Feb 2011 at 1:05 pm
3rd Feb 2011 at 1:06 pm
Egypt is the key to brokering agreements in the Middle East, which is why America isn't too keen on dissing the dictatorship.Might explain this map then...
3rd Feb 2011 at 1:33 pm
One Page
© James Aitken & The Vegetable Revolution. / « / No Newer Posts »
Main / Rants / Spam / Music / Poetry + Prose / Mega-Zine Letters / Mega-Zine Chat / News / FAQ / Members / Art / Avatars + Signatures / Random / Meets / Archive / Yahoo VR